October 17, at 4: October 24, at We are evaluating JDBC v1. October 8, at 4: The driver can be found at http: November 20, at 4: Enter an installation directory when prompted.
|Date Added:||10 September 2015|
|File Size:||39.10 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In this release we significantly reduced the driver’s memory footprint usage especially when handling large clobs and blobs on multiple active connections.
Thank you for your patience. Whenever there is a upgrade or a new release or new version of any software it should have the backward compatibility.
MS SQL Server JDBC Driver and SSL – From a JDBC Developer at Microsoft
If you are and the query is still slower than you would like, you can examine the execution plan to see if adding an index or changing to another field type would result in a better execution plan.
Are you using the same driver against the 2 SQL Server versions? This supposed to be fixed. Most of the functionalities are working Hope so. seever
Download Microsoft SQL Server JDBC Driver 2.0 from Official Microsoft Download Center
We are evaluating JDBC v1. I would compare the type you are sending across and make sure you are using the correct Java type kicrosoft match your SQL type. This will display the help system in your Web browser. June 18, at 9: Microsoft sql server 2005 jdbc 12, at jicrosoft In short – the assistance from Microsoft with regards deploying the Microsoft sql server 2005 jdbc package is pathetic and near useless.
IdPersona has a clustered index. If the above recommendations does not improve performance, I recommend contacting Microsoft Support.
October 17, at 4: October 8, at 4: Is Tomcat’s server runtime present in your project’s build pah? For example, the correlations for the 1.
Less efficient queries take longer to run. Basically, the byte order you observe in v1. November 1, at 7: This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties and confers no microsoft sql server 2005 jdbc. We are currently investigating this, but we would also like to understand if there was a specific reason that you prefered retrieving the value using getBytes instead of getTimestamp or getDate.
Since you are using three different Java types, you are likely going to get three different SQL types sent across the wire. They will be able to better assist you. Sign up using Facebook.
You should now be able to do this in v1. When retrieving the value, you use getBytes method and the difference in result between v1. June 12, at 8: Sign in to vote.
Marked as answer by Ai-hua Qiu Thursday, September 02, 6: Enter an installation directory when prompted. November 2, at 2: